SCBWI's Blueboard - A Message & Chat Board

Roald Dahl Shed.

Discussion started on

Guys, I am putting this in here 'cos I am not sure where sure it would and it is a topic of discussion in British television and quite a few newspapers.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-14896735

Would you think it is important to preserve such buildings where writers are known to create their greatest work?  Or would you see that it would be a waste of time and money to spend cash on a garden shed?
#1 - September 14, 2011, 01:29 AM

jeffman

Guest
Kinda like asking if it's worth it to remake the Charlie and the Chocolate Factory film. If enough people think it's worth it, it's worth it. In the case of Roald Dahl, I personally wouldn't contribute, but that's maybe not relevant.
#2 - September 14, 2011, 06:17 AM

Administrator
Poster Plus
  • ****
  • SCBWI Member
  • SCBWI Region dakotas
I think Roald Dahl has just such a far-reaching influence in kids' literature, even over here. I think it should definitely be preserved!
#3 - September 14, 2011, 06:21 AM

 :werd totally agree with Olmue!
#4 - September 14, 2011, 06:45 AM
"Maya was Grumpy"
Flashlight Press 
May 2013.
www.pippinmathur.com

Emeritus
Poster Plus
  • *
  • SCBWI Member
  • SCBWI Region newengland
I agree, though I do see the point raised in the article about the family contributing most of the money.  (Unless someone else is getting his royalties, which I'm sure are considerable....)

I'm guessing, though, that there will be enough help from fans who agree that the building should be preserved.  It's a great project, IMHO.
#5 - September 14, 2011, 06:49 AM

I think the family of Roald Dahl had an argument that he is seen as a national treasure, which for many, he is, and as such, why shouldn't the british public contribute.  But the argument was also put forward that the Dahl already have made their money from his work, so it is up to them to preserve all of his work.
It does beg the question, however, if you think about it...what would happen to our little writing havens if any of us unpublished writers had our published?  In my case, I write in a coffee shop where the seat I usually occupy has ripped arm rests and I notice crumbs down the sides.
It's still more comfy than listening the rattling water pipes at home.  But that's another thing my ratty landlord won't fix!
#6 - September 14, 2011, 08:57 AM

jeffman

Guest
It's worth keeping in mind that

1. The modern British have a tradition of nationalizing important buildings, castles, and similar stuff for the public good. I don't know if a shed counts, but the Brits do more of this stuff than we yanks; our standards may not apply

2. Depending on the way the Dahl estate is structured, the family may not actually get that much, taxes in England being so high. OTOH, for all I know, it's all socked away offshore, and that would make a huge difference.
#7 - September 14, 2011, 10:17 AM

Member
Poster Plus
  • *
  • SCBWI Member
  • SCBWI Region britishisles
From what I read, it doesn't sound as though the estate gets that much each year. The cost of preserving the shed would wipe out two years worth of estate profit (this is based on the figures I read). I would be reticent to shell out all that cash so that the British public could enjoy it because, after all, Dahl wrote books, that was his job and, rightly, when those books sell his estate still gets money from it. Why should they spend it on preserving his shed, unless THEY want his shed preserved?

I think what irked people was the idea that they should dig into their own pockets to preserve it - that the estate managers had asked for help. I'd bet that if they'd just said, "Oh we're going to knock the shed down," everyone would have rallied, but people don't like to be asked for charity, they prefer to think of it themselves, and offer it up without having to be asked. It feels a lot nicer that way!
#8 - September 14, 2011, 10:57 AM

Emeritus
Poster Plus
  • *
  • SCBWI Member
  • SCBWI Region newengland

I think what irked people was the idea that they should dig into their own pockets to preserve it - that the estate managers had asked for help. I'd bet that if they'd just said, "Oh we're going to knock the shed down," everyone would have rallied, but people don't like to be asked for charity, they prefer to think of it themselves, and offer it up without having to be asked. It feels a lot nicer that way!

A very good point.  Also, excellent new avatar!
#9 - September 14, 2011, 11:33 AM

Members:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.